Where is it all headed? What does it all mean?
I’ve let the blog go a bit cold! It’s been a very busy past few months and feeding the beast has been tricky despite a busy tech news season.
A few weeks ago, Oracle announced a semi-hostile takeover bid for my former employer BEA Systems.
The Wall Street Journal put the offer in context with an article that portrayed Alfred Chuang as one of the last of a dying breed – the founder/CEO of an independent mid-sized software company.
The data supporting this assertion are actually mixed.
1. Many mid-sized enterprise software companies are still alive and kicking including TIBCO, SAS, Kronos, Cognos, Manhattan and Parametric.
2. However many mid-sized software companies have left the scene including Siebel, Hyperion, Agile, Retek, PeopleSoft, webMethods, Mercury, and now possibly BEA.
3. However many newcomers seem poised to replace those that have left. For example Salesforce, Successfactors, vmWare, Red Hat, Netsuite and Rearden Commerce.
4. However many of these newcomers are struggling to sustain growth as public companies or are struggling to get public in the first place. And the aggregate revenues & employment of the new companies is far less than the companies they are replacing.
So what does it all mean?
Since inception the high tech industry has moved in cycles. But I don’t think all parts of the industry follow the same frequency. The frequency many of us think of the system architecture cycle. We’ve heard this dozens of times before: first there were mainframes, followed by minicomputers, followed by client-server, followed by N-tier apps, perhaps now followed by something more grand that lives in the cloud. If you look at the history of this evolution, it would lead you to believe high tech has roughly a 7 year clock cycle from boom to bust and back again.
But if you look just at consumer software applications, it would look quite different. First there were many desktop application companies, then there was Microsoft, then there was more Microsoft, then there was more Microsoft and well, you get the point. Microsoft launched Office as a suite in 1989 and it has taken roughly 16 years before anyone or anything managed to mount a credible assault on its hegemony. Much slower clock cycle.
So, whither enterprise software? Is our industry consolidating? If so, is it the consolidation before the next big bang? I’m pretty unsure of both points at this stage.


2 Comments:
I like your post and the analysis. But I think that the categories you use are narrow. While Microsoft has dominated the "Office" category, they have done nothing like Adobe, Intuit, McAffee, Symantec, Autodesk, Borland, Skype, etc... OK, so we have a word processor, which most professionals DON'T use. Programmers don't use word for editing, same goes for graphics and finance. I think that in the enterprise s/w world you also see a very narrow view. Linked-In is just an enterprise s/w company as salesforce.com or ACT! or goldmine or even Monster (they sell "back-end" access to their data!) Developers sometimes get 'stuck' in a mode of categorizing something some way. But I know more people who use G-Mail on a browser when they are not at the office as people who use Outlook! Marketers and "product managers" (whatever that means in your specific organization) forget that the market for software is as big as your imagination. Microsoft has done nothing in many areas. But you and me are just to blame. If you look just at the numbers of Intuit's Quickbooks, but they don't have a TRUE international version. Here in Israel we are dying, literally, for an international accounting package, small, cheap, with plug-ins for simple things like VAT and international tariff rates. If Intuit opened a development center in Israel or India or Greece or ... they will have it in about 2 years. If you ask a dozen people about what could be done better, probably 10 out of 12 will not give you Microsoft examples. Hopefully this is a message to use your imagination, not to think of me as a rant writing foreign geek!
Oes Tsetnoc one of the ways in which we can learn seo besides Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa. By participating in the Oes Tsetnoc or Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa we can improve our seo skills. To find more information about Oest Tsetnoc please visit my Oes Tsetnoc pages. And to find more information about Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa please visit my Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa pages. Thank you So much.
Oes Tsetnoc | Semangat Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa
Post a Comment
<< Home